{"id":1959,"date":"2025-10-09T15:20:29","date_gmt":"2025-10-09T09:50:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/?p=1959"},"modified":"2025-10-25T08:40:26","modified_gmt":"2025-10-25T03:10:26","slug":"google-kills-num100-good-or-bad-for-seo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/google-kills-num100-good-or-bad-for-seo\/","title":{"rendered":"Google Kills &#038;num=100: Good or Bad for SEO?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>The SEO Earthquake You Didn\u2019t See Coming<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In a stunning move, Google quietly removed the &amp;num=100 URL parameter \u2014 a seemingly minor change yet with significant ripple effects. And the SEO world is buzzing: Is this a blessing, a curse, or a messy pivot we\u2019ll look back on as a turning point?<\/p>\n<p>In this post, we\u2019ll unpack:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li>The hard data: What changed, how badly, and for whom?<\/li>\n<li>Why Google may have done this.<\/li>\n<li>The upside and downside for SEO professionals.<\/li>\n<li>What you should do now.<\/li>\n<li>Predictions: Is this permanent, and how will it reshape SEO landscapes?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Let\u2019s dive deep because this is not just another algorithm tweak. This is a structural shift.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>By the Numbers: What the Data Says<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Let\u2019s ground this in real, measurable shifts. Here are the most compelling statistics so far:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li>According to a study across 319 web properties by Tyler Gargula, <strong>87.7% of sites saw impressions fall<\/strong> after the num=100 parameter was removed. (<a href=\"https:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-num100-impact-data-462231?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Search Engine Land<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>77.6% of sites lost unique ranking queries<\/strong> (fewer keywords showing in reports) after the change. (<a href=\"https:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-num100-impact-data-462231?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Search Engine Land<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Many SEOs observed that <strong>average position improved sharply<\/strong>, even when clicks or traffic remained flat. Why? Because low-ranking impressions got filtered out. (<a href=\"https:\/\/eseospace.com\/blog\/navigating-the-fallout-how-googles-num100-removal-shook-seo-data\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">eSEOspace<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>In some dashboards, the number of keywords shown collapsed dramatically, especially those that once showed up on pages 3 through 10. (<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.com\/blog\/google-just-removed-num100\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Embryo<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In short, your GSC (Google Search Console) might now look weaker. But it doesn\u2019t necessarily mean your site got punished \u2013 more like your metrics got <em>cleaned<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Understanding &amp;num=100: Why Did It Exist (And Why It\u2019s Gone)<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>What was &amp;num=100?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Historically, adding &amp;num=100 to a Google search URL forced the engine to return up to 100 organic results on a single page, instead of the standard ~10 results per page. SEO tools, scrapers, rank trackers, and researchers used this as an efficient shortcut to fetch broad SERP data in one shot. (<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.com\/blog\/google-just-removed-num100\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Embryo<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Because of that, a page that ranked at position 75 or 96 would still show up in that single 100-result page, and thus register impressions or \u201cvisibility\u201d in tools and, in many cases, in GSC metrics.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Why Did Google Remove It?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Google hasn\u2019t published a formal roadmap about this change, but several industry hypotheses have gained traction:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Curtailing Mass Scraping and API Abuse<\/strong><br \/>\n&amp;num=100 made it trivially cheap for bots and tools to sweep deep into Google\u2019s index. Removing it raises the cost (in queries, bandwidth and infrastructure) for scraping. (<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.com\/blog\/google-just-removed-num100\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Embryo<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Defending Against AI\/Data Harvesting<\/strong><br \/>\nWith generative AI platforms increasingly leveraging search data, Google may want to limit how easily large swaths of SERP content are scraped and ingested. (<a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/%40ernestodotnet\/google-just-made-the-web-smaller-for-ai-with-the-num-100-issue-and-your-seo-tools-are-freaking-d7576f9609c7?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Medium<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reducing Server Load\/Optimising Infrastructure<\/strong><br \/>\nEvery &amp;num=100 request is heavier. By restricting to smaller result sets (e.g., only top 10 or top 20), Google can reduce strain from non-human traffic. (<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.com\/blog\/google-just-removed-num100\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Embryo<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cleaning Impression Data\/Reducing \u201cVanity Metrics\u201d<\/strong><br \/>\nMany impressions counted by GSC were artefacts of bots or tools crawling SERPs. By removing &amp;num=100, Google essentially filters out those phantom impressions and presents a more human-centric snapshot. (<a href=\"https:\/\/locomotive.agency\/blog\/google-removes-num100-parameter-what-this-means-for-your-website\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">locomotive.agency<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Changing the Tracking Economy<\/strong><br \/>\nRank trackers are forced to make more individual requests (paging), raising their infrastructure costs. Some of that burden may shift to users in the form of higher subscription rates or limited \u201ctop N\u201d tracking. (<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.com\/blog\/google-just-removed-num100\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Embryo<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>One SEO commentator, Brodie Clark, suggests this move might also signal a rethinking of \u201cThe Great Decoupling\u201d &#8211; the idea that clicks and impressions were decoupling due to <a href=\"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/the-seo-ai-evolution-by-2026\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AI overviews<\/a> and SERP features.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Good or Bad for SEO? The Pros, the Cons, and the Grey Areas<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>This change is not purely negative or positive \u2014 it\u2019s nuanced. Let\u2019s break down the implications.<\/p>\n<h4><strong>The Downsides (What SEOs Are Crying About)<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Vanishing Impressions and Keywords in Reports<\/strong><br \/>\nWhat looked like a collapse in visibility is often just a data artefact. Many SEOs panic when their dashboards implode.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lost Visibility into Low-Ranking Pages<\/strong><br \/>\nKeywords that lived on pages 4\u201310 (or deeper) are now effectively invisible to rank trackers and GSC reports. That limits long-tail insights.<\/li>\n<li><strong>False Sense of Ranking Uplift<\/strong><br \/>\nBecause low-ranked impressions disappeared, average positions appear to \u201cimprove\u201d. But that doesn\u2019t always reflect genuine ranking gains.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Higher Cost and Complexity for Rank Tracking Tools<\/strong><br \/>\nTools must now paginate, make multiple requests, manage rate limits, and handle data gaps. That might push subscription prices upward.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Data Discontinuity\/Shifting Baselines<\/strong><br \/>\nComparing pre- and post-change data is misleading. Many SEOs will struggle with setting new benchmarks.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Potential Skew of Competitive Intelligence<\/strong><br \/>\nYour visibility into competitor rankings might be limited \u2014 especially for deeper keywords \u2014 making it harder to spy on the long tail.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>The Upsides (Hidden Benefits)<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Cleaner, More Accurate Data<\/strong><br \/>\nWhat you see in GSC is more closely tied to <em>real human visibility<\/em> rather than bot-driven metrics.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Less Noise from Trivial Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nYou can focus on terms that matter (those that actually reach results pages).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Signals More Aligned with Business Outcomes<\/strong><br \/>\nWith impressions less inflated, metrics like clicks, CTR, and conversions become more reliable as performance indicators.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Forces <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/is-seo-dead-or-evolving-with-ai\/\"><strong>Smarter SEO Strategies<\/strong><\/a><br \/>\nYou\u2019ll need to lean more into topic clustering, entity-based SEO, authority-building, and content depth, as raw \u201cspray and pray\u201d tactics for page 7 keywords no longer yield visible returns.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Better Alignment with AEO\/Generative Search<\/strong><br \/>\nAs search evolves beyond ten blue links, SEOs must optimize for retrievability in generative engine results, not just page position. A cleaner dataset helps with that pivot.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reduces False Positives in Data Anomalies<\/strong><br \/>\nIn a post-num=100 world, a sudden drop in impressions is more likely to map to an actual visibility issue, not scraping noise.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>The Middle Ground <\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li>This change doesn\u2019t mean Google is penalizing you. Your rankings may remain unchanged since it\u2019s mostly how tools are reading data.<\/li>\n<li>For high-volume, competitive niches, some insights may still be lost, but for many niches, the insights you <em>need<\/em> are still intact (top 3, top 10).<\/li>\n<li>Some tools may develop clever workarounds (e.g., selective scraping, hybrid paging, etc.) to restore partial visibility into 100 results, but those come with tradeoffs (cost, rate limiting and reliability).<\/li>\n<li>The shift accelerates the importance of non-GSC signals (site analytics, internal search metrics, brand search trends and AI engine presence) in decision-making.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center also-read\"><strong><b>Also Read: \u00a0<\/b><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/trends-that-may-shape-the-future-of-digital-marketing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong><u>Trends That May Shape the Future of Digital Marketing<\/u><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<h3><strong>What You Should Do Now: An SEO Playbook<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>If you run SEO for yourself or your clients and depend on rank tracking, here\u2019s a structured response:<\/p>\n<h4><strong>Educate &amp; Rebaseline<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Explain to stakeholders<\/strong> (clients, execs and teams): \u201cThat crash in impressions isn\u2019t because we tanked. Google changed how impressions work.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Set a new baseline<\/strong> \u2014 don\u2019t compare data across the change boundary. Use the post-num=100 period as your new \u201cnormal\u201d.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Avoid snap judgments <\/strong>\u2014 use conversion and organic traffic trends more than impressions during this shift.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>Revamp Metrics That Matter<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Clicks, CTR and conversions<\/strong> become your primary KPIs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>URL-Level Performance<\/strong>: Look at which pages still get visibility (clicks\/impressions) rather than chasing low-ranking keywords.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Brand Search Lift<\/strong>: Use brand queries as a proxy for awareness.<\/li>\n<li><strong>SERP Feature Presence<\/strong>: Track whether you&#8217;re appearing in answer boxes, \u201cPeople Also Ask\u201d, AI overviews, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>Monitor Tool Response &amp; Adapt<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"list-icon check\">\n<li>Watch for rank-tracker updates. Some are pivoting to:\n<ul class=\"list-icon cog\" style=\"margin-top: 10px;\">\n<li>Tracking only the top 10 or top 20 rankings.<\/li>\n<li>Hybrid frequency models (e.g., daily top 20, weekly top 100, etc.). (<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.com\/blog\/google-just-removed-num100\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Embryo<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Smarter, selective crawling instead of scraping the full 100 results. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.interodigital.com\/blog\/google-quietly-killed-the-num100-parameter-heres-why-your-rankings-and-impressions-just-got-weird\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Intero Digital<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Be cautious of subscription inflation. Some tools may justify price hikes due to higher crawling overhead.<\/li>\n<li>Use multiple data sources (Search Console, GA4, server logs, internal search data, etc.) rather than relying solely on one dashboard.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Focus SEO Efforts Where They Yield Returns<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Depth &gt; Breadth<\/strong>: Invest in pillar content, topic clusters, and content that commands authority.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Entity and Semantic SEO<\/strong>: Optimise for showcasing your brand and expertise in a way that can be picked up by generative engines (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Local &amp; Geo Signals<\/strong>: Strengthen local SEO, proximity, and geographic relevance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Content Discovery Diversification<\/strong>: Use YouTube, forums, social, Quora, and podcasts so you\u2019re discoverable via multiple paths beyond traditional SERPs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Internal Linking &amp; Architecture<\/strong>: Boost crawlability and juice flow to pages you care about most.<\/li>\n<li><strong>User Engagement &amp; Intent Match<\/strong>: Make content more aligned to real queries, not \u201ckeyword stuffing\u201d for the long tail.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Experiment with AEO\/Generative Optimisation<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li>If you aren\u2019t already, begin optimising for AI\/LLM-driven search (AEO \/ GEO) by targeting entities, using structured data, and surfacing directly answerable content.<\/li>\n<li>Use schema markup, semantic cues, and content structure to increase the chance of being surfaced by AI-based answers.<\/li>\n<li>Monitor referral traffic from AI sources (ChatGPT answers, Bing Chat and other generative overlays) and tag them in your analytics.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Keep an Eye on Google Messaging &amp; Updates<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li>So far, about the whole num=100 ordeal, Google has only said: \u201cThe use of this URL parameter is not something that we formally support.\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.com\/blog\/google-just-removed-num100\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Embryo<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Watch for announcements or reversals. This change may be refined over time, or they might add an alternate \u201cofficial\u201d API or endpoint for tools.<\/li>\n<li>Stay active in SEO communities to catch early workaround signals.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Is This Permanent? Predictions &amp; What It Means for the Future<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This removal feels less like a bug and more like a deliberate strategy. Here\u2019s what we foresee:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Long term, this will stick<\/strong>. Google is making the SERP \u201cdeeper data\u201d less accessible to external automation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Premium \u201cdeeper rank access\u201d may become monetised <\/strong>\u2014 Google could offer an API or paid tool for more extensive SERP access.<\/li>\n<li><strong>SEO tools will restructure their models <\/strong>\u2014 fewer \u201c100-rank dumps\u201d and more emphasis on top-20 or SERP features.<\/li>\n<li><strong>We\u2019ll see SEO specialisation shift <\/strong>\u2014 the \u201clong tail jockeys\u201d will either move to niche verticals or deeper content ecosystems (forums, voice and AI) rather than Google SERPs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generative\/AI discovery will become more central <\/strong>\u2014 if you\u2019re not optimising for retrievability inside AI systems, you\u2019ll lose a share of attention.<\/li>\n<li><strong>SERP features (answer boxes, zero-click results, local packs, etc.) will gain more weight<\/strong> in strategies \u2014 static blue links will matter less.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Data transparency pressure will increase <\/strong>\u2014 marketers will demand better clarity from Google and tool providers on how data is gathered, filtered, and presented.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In short, this feels like a structural pivot, not a temporary correction.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Final Verdict: Good, Bad, or \u201cIt Depends\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Is scrapping num=100 good or bad for SEO? The honest answer: <strong>Both, but mostly good if you adapt<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Bad<\/strong>, because it\u2019s messy, disorienting, and breaks legacy reporting.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Good<\/strong>, because it forces us to focus on <em>real<\/em> visibility, more meaningful metrics, and cleaner data.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Neutral<\/strong>, because your actual rankings may not change at all \u2014 just how they&#8217;re seen in tools and dashboards.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If your strategy leans on chasing page 5\u20137 keywords or chasing inflated impression counts, this move may hurt you. But if you\u2019re ready to lean into authority, relevance, deeper content, user signals, and generative presence, this change can be a net win.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>SEO Tips in the Wake of num=100<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><strong>Leverage Local Intent<\/strong>: For local audiences, geo modifiers (city, state, etc.) in queries matter. Make sure you embed location cues in content and schema.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Test Your SERP Footprint Per State<\/strong>: Some keywords rank differently across various places. Use geo-based tools, even if rank trackers lose depth.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Capitalise on SERP Features<\/strong>: Many searches trigger \u201cPeople Also Ask\u201d, Knowledge Panels, map packs, and answer boxes. Being featured here can offset the loss of deep-ranking visibility.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Monitor Voice Search\/Smart Assistants<\/strong>: Devices like Alexa, Google Home, Siri, etc. matter. Optimising for voice (concise, answer-first structure) can help.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cater to Mobile-First Users<\/strong>: Most people search on phones; speed, mobile UX, Core Web Vitals, and PWA\/AMP optimisations still count heavily.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Brand + Review Signals<\/strong>: Brand trust, reputation, review stars, and social proof can help you stand out, especially when organic rankings are more compressed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Capitalise on Niche Long-Tail Content Beyond SERP<\/strong>: Use local blogs, forums (Reddit communities, regional interest sites, etc.) and guest contributions &#8211; expand discoverability beyond just Google.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 style=\"margin-top: 15px;\"><strong>FAQs<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol class=\"decimal\">\n<li><strong> Does this change hurt my actual Google rankings?<\/strong><br \/>\nNo. The change primarily affects how data is retrieved and reported &#8211; not how Google ranks pages. If your content quality, backlinks, and user experience remain strong, your ranking outcomes are unlikely to change directly because of this.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Why did my impressions drop while clicks stayed stable?<\/strong><br \/>\nBecause many of the impressions lost were phantom (bot-driven) impressions in deeper pages that rarely led to clicks. Removing them causes a drop in total impressions but doesn\u2019t necessarily affect real user traffic.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Should I cancel my SEO tool subscription?<\/strong><br \/>\nDon\u2019t rush. Watch how those tools adapt. Many will update to cope with the change. However, evaluate whether their value still aligns with your needs, especially if you prioritize top-10 or top-20 rankings.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Can I still see page 100 rankings somehow?<\/strong><br \/>\nSome tools are trying hybrid crawling (paging requests) or selective deep scraping. But there\u2019s no guarantee of reliability, and Google may further limit or block such techniques.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Is the num=100 removal final?<\/strong><br \/>\nIt appears to be. Google\u2019s silence strengthens that probability. However, they may offer a controlled API or introduce a new parameter for tool partners. Keep an eye on announcements.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><strong>LBN Tech Solutions<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The removal of num=100 marks a turning point in how we understand SEO data \u2014 it\u2019s no longer about chasing inflated numbers but about building genuine visibility where it matters. As Google redefines search and AI-driven discovery evolves, brands that adapt early will lead the pack. At LBN, we help businesses navigate these shifts with data-driven SEO, AEO, and GEO strategies that will keep you ahead, irrespective of how fast the search landscape changes. Ready to future-proof your SEO strategy? <strong>Visit us <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"How to rank your local business on Google(Fast)\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Wd6uFjFennk?list=PLItBbc--W8imJAPLIXwAv_VyL9Ae0wXJp\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The SEO Earthquake You Didn\u2019t See Coming In a stunning move, Google quietly removed the &amp;num=100 URL parameter \u2014 a seemingly minor change yet with significant ripple effects. And the SEO world is buzzing: Is this a blessing, a curse, or a messy pivot we\u2019ll look back on as a turning point? In this post, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1962,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[29],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1959"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1959"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1959\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1964,"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1959\/revisions\/1964"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1962"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lbntechsolutions.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}