Google Kills &num=100 Parameter | What This Means for SEO

The SEO Earthquake You Didn’t See Coming

In a stunning move, Google quietly removed the &num=100 URL parameter — a seemingly minor change yet with significant ripple effects. And the SEO world is buzzing: Is this a blessing, a curse, or a messy pivot we’ll look back on as a turning point?

In this post, we’ll unpack:

The hard data: What changed, how badly, and for whom?
Why Google may have done this.
The upside and downside for SEO professionals.
What you should do now.
Predictions: Is this permanent, and how will it reshape SEO landscapes?

Let’s dive deep because this is not just another algorithm tweak. This is a structural shift.

By the Numbers: What the Data Says

Let’s ground this in real, measurable shifts. Here are the most compelling statistics so far:

According to a study across 319 web properties by Tyler Gargula, 87.7% of sites saw impressions fall after the num=100 parameter was removed. (Search Engine Land)
77.6% of sites lost unique ranking queries (fewer keywords showing in reports) after the change. (Search Engine Land)
Many SEOs observed that average position improved sharply, even when clicks or traffic remained flat. Why? Because low-ranking impressions got filtered out. (eSEOspace)
In some dashboards, the number of keywords shown collapsed dramatically, especially those that once showed up on pages 3 through 10. (Embryo)

In short, your GSC (Google Search Console) might now look weaker. But it doesn’t necessarily mean your site got punished – more like your metrics got cleaned.

Understanding &num=100: Why Did It Exist (And Why It’s Gone)

What was &num=100?

Historically, adding &num=100 to a Google search URL forced the engine to return up to 100 organic results on a single page, instead of the standard ~10 results per page. SEO tools, scrapers, rank trackers, and researchers used this as an efficient shortcut to fetch broad SERP data in one shot. (Embryo)

Because of that, a page that ranked at position 75 or 96 would still show up in that single 100-result page, and thus register impressions or “visibility” in tools and, in many cases, in GSC metrics.

Why Did Google Remove It?

Google hasn’t published a formal roadmap about this change, but several industry hypotheses have gained traction:

Curtailing Mass Scraping and API Abuse
&num=100 made it trivially cheap for bots and tools to sweep deep into Google’s index. Removing it raises the cost (in queries, bandwidth and infrastructure) for scraping. (Embryo)
Defending Against AI/Data Harvesting
With generative AI platforms increasingly leveraging search data, Google may want to limit how easily large swaths of SERP content are scraped and ingested. (Medium)
Reducing Server Load/Optimising Infrastructure
Every &num=100 request is heavier. By restricting to smaller result sets (e.g., only top 10 or top 20), Google can reduce strain from non-human traffic. (Embryo)
Cleaning Impression Data/Reducing “Vanity Metrics”
Many impressions counted by GSC were artefacts of bots or tools crawling SERPs. By removing &num=100, Google essentially filters out those phantom impressions and presents a more human-centric snapshot. (locomotive.agency)
Changing the Tracking Economy
Rank trackers are forced to make more individual requests (paging), raising their infrastructure costs. Some of that burden may shift to users in the form of higher subscription rates or limited “top N” tracking. (Embryo)

One SEO commentator, Brodie Clark, suggests this move might also signal a rethinking of “The Great Decoupling” – the idea that clicks and impressions were decoupling due to AI overviews and SERP features.

Good or Bad for SEO? The Pros, the Cons, and the Grey Areas

This change is not purely negative or positive — it’s nuanced. Let’s break down the implications.

The Downsides (What SEOs Are Crying About)

Vanishing Impressions and Keywords in Reports
What looked like a collapse in visibility is often just a data artefact. Many SEOs panic when their dashboards implode.
Lost Visibility into Low-Ranking Pages
Keywords that lived on pages 4–10 (or deeper) are now effectively invisible to rank trackers and GSC reports. That limits long-tail insights.
False Sense of Ranking Uplift
Because low-ranked impressions disappeared, average positions appear to “improve”. But that doesn’t always reflect genuine ranking gains.
Higher Cost and Complexity for Rank Tracking Tools
Tools must now paginate, make multiple requests, manage rate limits, and handle data gaps. That might push subscription prices upward.
Data Discontinuity/Shifting Baselines
Comparing pre- and post-change data is misleading. Many SEOs will struggle with setting new benchmarks.
Potential Skew of Competitive Intelligence
Your visibility into competitor rankings might be limited — especially for deeper keywords — making it harder to spy on the long tail.

The Upsides (Hidden Benefits)

Cleaner, More Accurate Data
What you see in GSC is more closely tied to real human visibility rather than bot-driven metrics.
Less Noise from Trivial Keywords
You can focus on terms that matter (those that actually reach results pages).
Signals More Aligned with Business Outcomes
With impressions less inflated, metrics like clicks, CTR, and conversions become more reliable as performance indicators.
Forces Smarter SEO Strategies
You’ll need to lean more into topic clustering, entity-based SEO, authority-building, and content depth, as raw “spray and pray” tactics for page 7 keywords no longer yield visible returns.
Better Alignment with AEO/Generative Search
As search evolves beyond ten blue links, SEOs must optimize for retrievability in generative engine results, not just page position. A cleaner dataset helps with that pivot.
Reduces False Positives in Data Anomalies
In a post-num=100 world, a sudden drop in impressions is more likely to map to an actual visibility issue, not scraping noise.

The Middle Ground

This change doesn’t mean Google is penalizing you. Your rankings may remain unchanged since it’s mostly how tools are reading data.
For high-volume, competitive niches, some insights may still be lost, but for many niches, the insights you need are still intact (top 3, top 10).
Some tools may develop clever workarounds (e.g., selective scraping, hybrid paging, etc.) to restore partial visibility into 100 results, but those come with tradeoffs (cost, rate limiting and reliability).
The shift accelerates the importance of non-GSC signals (site analytics, internal search metrics, brand search trends and AI engine presence) in decision-making.

Also Read: Trends That May Shape the Future of Digital Marketing

What You Should Do Now: An SEO Playbook

If you run SEO for yourself or your clients and depend on rank tracking, here’s a structured response:

Educate & Rebaseline

Explain to stakeholders (clients, execs and teams): “That crash in impressions isn’t because we tanked. Google changed how impressions work.”
Set a new baseline — don’t compare data across the change boundary. Use the post-num=100 period as your new “normal”.
Avoid snap judgments — use conversion and organic traffic trends more than impressions during this shift.

Revamp Metrics That Matter

Clicks, CTR and conversions become your primary KPIs.
URL-Level Performance: Look at which pages still get visibility (clicks/impressions) rather than chasing low-ranking keywords.
Brand Search Lift: Use brand queries as a proxy for awareness.
SERP Feature Presence: Track whether you’re appearing in answer boxes, “People Also Ask”, AI overviews, etc.

Monitor Tool Response & Adapt

Watch for rank-tracker updates. Some are pivoting to:
- Tracking only the top 10 or top 20 rankings.
- Hybrid frequency models (e.g., daily top 20, weekly top 100, etc.). (Embryo)
- Smarter, selective crawling instead of scraping the full 100 results. (Intero Digital)
Be cautious of subscription inflation. Some tools may justify price hikes due to higher crawling overhead.
Use multiple data sources (Search Console, GA4, server logs, internal search data, etc.) rather than relying solely on one dashboard.

Focus SEO Efforts Where They Yield Returns

Depth > Breadth: Invest in pillar content, topic clusters, and content that commands authority.
Entity and Semantic SEO: Optimise for showcasing your brand and expertise in a way that can be picked up by generative engines (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.).
Local & Geo Signals: Strengthen local SEO, proximity, and geographic relevance.
Content Discovery Diversification: Use YouTube, forums, social, Quora, and podcasts so you’re discoverable via multiple paths beyond traditional SERPs.
Internal Linking & Architecture: Boost crawlability and juice flow to pages you care about most.
User Engagement & Intent Match: Make content more aligned to real queries, not “keyword stuffing” for the long tail.

Experiment with AEO/Generative Optimisation

If you aren’t already, begin optimising for AI/LLM-driven search (AEO / GEO) by targeting entities, using structured data, and surfacing directly answerable content.
Use schema markup, semantic cues, and content structure to increase the chance of being surfaced by AI-based answers.
Monitor referral traffic from AI sources (ChatGPT answers, Bing Chat and other generative overlays) and tag them in your analytics.

Keep an Eye on Google Messaging & Updates

So far, about the whole num=100 ordeal, Google has only said: “The use of this URL parameter is not something that we formally support.” (Embryo)
Watch for announcements or reversals. This change may be refined over time, or they might add an alternate “official” API or endpoint for tools.
Stay active in SEO communities to catch early workaround signals.

Is This Permanent? Predictions & What It Means for the Future

This removal feels less like a bug and more like a deliberate strategy. Here’s what we foresee:

Long term, this will stick. Google is making the SERP “deeper data” less accessible to external automation.
Premium “deeper rank access” may become monetised — Google could offer an API or paid tool for more extensive SERP access.
SEO tools will restructure their models — fewer “100-rank dumps” and more emphasis on top-20 or SERP features.
We’ll see SEO specialisation shift — the “long tail jockeys” will either move to niche verticals or deeper content ecosystems (forums, voice and AI) rather than Google SERPs.
Generative/AI discovery will become more central — if you’re not optimising for retrievability inside AI systems, you’ll lose a share of attention.
SERP features (answer boxes, zero-click results, local packs, etc.) will gain more weight in strategies — static blue links will matter less.
Data transparency pressure will increase — marketers will demand better clarity from Google and tool providers on how data is gathered, filtered, and presented.

In short, this feels like a structural pivot, not a temporary correction.

Final Verdict: Good, Bad, or “It Depends”?

Is scrapping num=100 good or bad for SEO? The honest answer: Both, but mostly good if you adapt.

Bad, because it’s messy, disorienting, and breaks legacy reporting.
Good, because it forces us to focus on real visibility, more meaningful metrics, and cleaner data.
Neutral, because your actual rankings may not change at all — just how they’re seen in tools and dashboards.

If your strategy leans on chasing page 5–7 keywords or chasing inflated impression counts, this move may hurt you. But if you’re ready to lean into authority, relevance, deeper content, user signals, and generative presence, this change can be a net win.

SEO Tips in the Wake of num=100

Leverage Local Intent: For local audiences, geo modifiers (city, state, etc.) in queries matter. Make sure you embed location cues in content and schema.
Test Your SERP Footprint Per State: Some keywords rank differently across various places. Use geo-based tools, even if rank trackers lose depth.
Capitalise on SERP Features: Many searches trigger “People Also Ask”, Knowledge Panels, map packs, and answer boxes. Being featured here can offset the loss of deep-ranking visibility.
Monitor Voice Search/Smart Assistants: Devices like Alexa, Google Home, Siri, etc. matter. Optimising for voice (concise, answer-first structure) can help.
Cater to Mobile-First Users: Most people search on phones; speed, mobile UX, Core Web Vitals, and PWA/AMP optimisations still count heavily.
Brand + Review Signals: Brand trust, reputation, review stars, and social proof can help you stand out, especially when organic rankings are more compressed.
Capitalise on Niche Long-Tail Content Beyond SERP: Use local blogs, forums (Reddit communities, regional interest sites, etc.) and guest contributions – expand discoverability beyond just Google.

FAQs

Does this change hurt my actual Google rankings?
No. The change primarily affects how data is retrieved and reported – not how Google ranks pages. If your content quality, backlinks, and user experience remain strong, your ranking outcomes are unlikely to change directly because of this.
Why did my impressions drop while clicks stayed stable?
Because many of the impressions lost were phantom (bot-driven) impressions in deeper pages that rarely led to clicks. Removing them causes a drop in total impressions but doesn’t necessarily affect real user traffic.
Should I cancel my SEO tool subscription?
Don’t rush. Watch how those tools adapt. Many will update to cope with the change. However, evaluate whether their value still aligns with your needs, especially if you prioritize top-10 or top-20 rankings.
Can I still see page 100 rankings somehow?
Some tools are trying hybrid crawling (paging requests) or selective deep scraping. But there’s no guarantee of reliability, and Google may further limit or block such techniques.
Is the num=100 removal final?
It appears to be. Google’s silence strengthens that probability. However, they may offer a controlled API or introduce a new parameter for tool partners. Keep an eye on announcements.

LBN Tech Solutions

The removal of num=100 marks a turning point in how we understand SEO data — it’s no longer about chasing inflated numbers but about building genuine visibility where it matters. As Google redefines search and AI-driven discovery evolves, brands that adapt early will lead the pack. At LBN, we help businesses navigate these shifts with data-driven SEO, AEO, and GEO strategies that will keep you ahead, irrespective of how fast the search landscape changes. Ready to future-proof your SEO strategy? Visit us here.

0 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Google Kills &num=100: Good or Bad for SEO?